The Felt
Bankroll Management

Poker Staking and Backing Explained

Poker staking lets a backer fund your play for a share of profits. Here's how deals, markup, and makeup work — with a worked settlement example.

On this page · 7 sections

Staking is when a backer funds your buy-ins in exchange for an agreed cut of your profits. You risk less of your own money and can play stakes your roll can’t cover; the backer earns from your edge without playing a hand. Most deals split profits after the backer’s losses are repaid — the part that trips people up. Here’s how the money actually flows.

The two sides of a stake

Every staking deal has a backer (puts up money) and a horse (plays the games). The horse takes on little or no financial downside; the backer takes on the results in exchange for a slice of the wins.

A typical arrangement is a 50/50 split after makeup: the backer funds 100% of buy-ins, and once the horse is in profit, the two split the winnings evenly. Splits vary — a well-known winner might keep 70% while the backer takes 30%, and a raw beginner might only get 30–40%.

Makeup: the concept that decides everything

Makeup is the accumulated losses the backer has paid for that the horse must earn back before profit-sharing resumes. Picture a shared ledger:

  • You buy in for $500, backed 100%, and lose. Makeup is now $500.
  • Next session you win $300. That $300 pays down the makeup, which drops to $200. Neither of you takes a cut yet.
  • You win $400. First $200 clears the remaining makeup; the leftover $200 is real profit and gets split.

You are always playing to zero first. This is why staking rewards consistent grinders over big-swing gamblers — sitting in deep makeup with no split in sight is demoralizing and common.

Worked settlement example

You’re backed 100% on a 50/50 deal across a month of $1/$2 online cash:

SessionResultRunning makeupSplit this session
1−$600$600$0
2+$250$350$0
3−$150$500$0
4+$900$0$400 profit → $200 you / $200 backer

You finished the month +$400 net for the partnership, but you personally walk with $200 — half the profit — while risking none of your own money. The backer risked the swings and earned $200 for financing your edge. Note the makeup climbed to $500 before session 4 finally cleared it and produced the first split.

Markup: selling tournament action

For tournaments, players often sell pieces of themselves at markup — a premium reflecting their skill edge. If you sell action at 1.2 markup, a buyer pays $120 for $100 of your results.

  • Sell 50% of a $1,000 buy-in at 1.2 → buyers pay $600 for $500 of equity.
  • If you win $10,000, the buyers’ 50% share is $5,000; they paid $600 for it — a strong return.
  • The $100 of markup you kept ($600 paid − $500 face) offsets your own remaining risk and rewards your proven ROI.

Markup above ~1.3 is only justified by a genuine, sample-backed edge. Overpriced action is a bad buy — vet the seller’s tournament results the way you’d size any tournament bankroll.

The trade-offs before you sign

Staking is not free money — it’s a transfer of both risk and reward.

  • You give up most of your upside. A 50% cut of your own win rate is a big price for reduced variance.
  • You answer to someone. Backers may set stakes, hours, game selection, or stop-losses.
  • Makeup can trap you. Deep in makeup with a losing backer relationship, you may feel stuck playing to repay a debt rather than to grow.
  • Trust is everything. Deals live and die on honest record-keeping. Get terms in writing — split, makeup rules, who chooses games, and how to exit.

Being staked shifts risk off your own roll, but the discipline it demands is as much mental as financial: grinding through makeup tests patience the same way a downswing does.

When staking makes sense

Staking suits a player who is genuinely winning but under-rolled — you have the edge but not the buy-ins. It’s a poor fit if you’re a losing or breakeven player, because you’ll simply pile up makeup you can never clear, and the backer will cut you.

If you can fund your own play, running your own bankroll usually beats giving away half your profits. Staking is a bridge for the under-capitalized, not a permanent way to keep 100% of nothing.

Put it together

Staking trades a share of your winnings for someone else absorbing your variance: a backer funds the buy-ins, makeup tracks the losses you must repay, and markup prices your edge when you sell tournament action. Understand the ledger before you agree to anything, and keep building toward funding your own play — the full system lives in the bankroll management hub.

Frequently asked

What is staking in poker?

Staking is when a backer puts up some or all of your buy-in in exchange for an agreed share of your profits. You take on less financial risk; they take on a piece of your results, good or bad.

What is makeup in poker staking?

Makeup is the running total of losses a backer has covered that you must repay from future winnings before you split profits again. Until you clear the makeup, you're playing to get back to even for the backer.

What does markup mean in tournament staking?

Markup is a premium a proven player charges on their action — selling a $1,000 seat at 1.2 markup means a buyer pays $1,200 for the equity in $1,000 of results, compensating for the seller's edge.

Is being staked worth it?

It lowers your variance and lets you play stakes your own bankroll can't cover, but you give up a large share of upside and answer to a backer. It suits players who are under-rolled but genuinely winning.

About the author

Online grinder; multi-tabling specialist · Reviewed by The Felt editorial team
Last updated 2025-05-26