The Felt
Poker Tools & Software

Hand History Converters and Replayers Explained

A hand history converter rewrites a poker room's text log into another format; a replayer animates it. What each does and when you actually need one.

On this page · 3 sections

A poker hand history converter rewrites the raw text log a room saves for each hand into a different format — usually so a tracker that doesn’t natively support your site can import the hands, or so you can share a clean version instead of a wall of text. A replayer is the sibling tool: it reads the same log and plays it back street by street as an animation you can actually watch. They’re often bundled together, but they solve two genuinely different problems, and knowing which one you need saves you from reaching for the wrong tool.

Why the format even matters

Every online room saves each hand as a plain-text file: the seats, blinds, every action, the board, the result. It’s complete, but each site writes it in its own dialect — different labels, different ordering. Your tracking software reads these files to build its database, and if it doesn’t recognize a room’s dialect, the import fails and those sessions vanish from your stats.

A format converter is the translation layer. It reads the room’s native text and re-emits it in a format your tracker does understand, typically the widely-supported layout of a major site. Same hands, different dialect, and now they load cleanly. The practical stakes are simple: without one, an unsupported site leaves a hole in your database exactly where your recent volume should be, which quietly skews every stat that depends on sample size.

The replayer half

Converting for a human is a separate job from converting for software. A replayer takes the text and rebuilds the hand visually — dealing the cards, laying out stacks, playing each bet in sequence. Watching a hand back this way surfaces things a text log buries: the sizing pattern, the tempo, the exact street where the decision turned. Some replayers also let you scrub back and forth or pause on a single decision, which is where they stop being a novelty and start being a study tool. It’s what makes a hand worth posting for a coach or a study group, and it feeds naturally into a real review workflow and sharper postflop reads.

A few cautions before you share

Three things trip people up with these tools. Mask the screen names before posting anything public — a raw hand history identifies the players in it. Confirm the conversion didn’t quietly drop antes, straddles, or side pots, because a lossy convert corrupts your database without any error message. And keep the whole process retrospective: converting and replaying finished hands is study, but feeding any tool into a decision during a live-money hand is banned real-time assistance, which is a hard line rather than a gray area. Beyond that, they’re among the lowest-friction tools in the study kit — explore the rest in the tools & software hub.

About the author

Solver-driven study, quantitative background · Reviewed by Chris Vaughn, senior editor
Last updated 2026-06-25