ICM Deal Making & Chops in Poker
An ICM deal splits the remaining prize pool by each player's real equity, not raw chip count. Here's how a chip-chop and ICM-chop differ, with the math.
On this page · 5 sections
An ICM deal is a final-table agreement to split the remaining prize money by each player’s real-money equity — calculated with the Independent Chip Model — instead of playing the tournament to its end. Because chips have diminishing value, an ICM chop pays the big stack less than its raw chip share and the short stacks more. It’s the fairest standard method for chopping, and it’s why a chip leader can’t simply demand the lion’s share.
Why players make deals
Tournaments are high-variance, and the gaps between top prizes are often huge. With a few players left and big money on the line, many agree to a deal to lock in profit and cut variance — the difference between first and third can be life-changing, and one cooler can erase a great run. Deals are common and usually legitimate; most poker rooms will pause the clock and help calculate one on request.
The two methods
There are two ways to split, and they give very different numbers:
- Chip chop — divide the prize pool in direct proportion to chip counts. Simple, but it overpays the big stack, because it pretends every chip is worth the same dollar amount.
- ICM chop — divide by ICM equity, which accounts for diminishing chip value and the payout ladder. It pays short stacks more than their chip share. This is the standard, fairer method.
A common hybrid is to apply ICM but then negotiate a small premium for the chip leader (who has the best chance at the trophy and the top prize). But the ICM numbers are the honest baseline everyone starts from.
Worked example: chip chop vs. ICM chop
Three players left. The remaining prize money to be split is $10,000, laid out as $5,000 / $3,000 / $2,000 for 1st / 2nd / 3rd. Stacks:
| Player | Chips | Chip % |
|---|---|---|
| A | 6,000 | 60% |
| B | 2,500 | 25% |
| C | 1,500 | 15% |
Chip chop simply hands each player their chip percentage of the $10,000:
| Player | Chip-chop payout |
|---|---|
| A | $6,000 |
| B | $2,500 |
| C | $1,500 |
But that’s unfair — it pays A above the $5,000 first prize, which is impossible to actually win, and starves the short stacks. Running the same stacks through ICM gives the true equities:
| Player | Chips | Chip-chop | ICM chop | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 6,000 | $6,000 | $4,106 | −$1,894 |
| B | 2,500 | $2,500 | $3,169 | +$669 |
| C | 1,500 | $1,500 | $2,725 | +$1,225 |
The shift is dramatic. The chip leader drops nearly $1,900 versus the naive chip chop, while the short stack gains over $1,200. Why? Because C, even with the smallest stack, is guaranteed at least $2,000 (third prize) just by being at the table — and has real chances at second and first. ICM captures that floor; the chip chop ignores it.
Should you take the deal?
ICM gives the fair number, but whether to accept depends on more than the math:
- Take it if you’re a short or medium stack, the numbers are fair, and you value locking in money over variance.
- Lean toward it if the field is tough and your edge is small — ICM already credits you fairly for your chips.
- Decline (or negotiate) if you have a genuine skill edge over the table, the proposed split undervalues your position, or there’s a title, trophy, or future-tournament equity (like a TV final table) worth playing for.
Remember ICM also assumes equal skill — if you’re clearly the best player left, your true equity is higher than the model says, which is a reason to play on or ask for a premium.
The bigger picture
Deal making is ICM applied at the most lucrative moment of a tournament, and it’s a core bankroll decision as much as a strategic one. The same equity math drives ICM pressure during play and the calculation method behind it. Start from the ICM hub to see how the pieces connect.
Frequently asked
What is an ICM deal in poker?
An ICM deal is a final-table agreement to split the remaining prize money according to each player's ICM equity — their real-money share based on stack sizes and the payout ladder — rather than playing it out.
What is the difference between a chip chop and an ICM chop?
A chip chop divides the prize pool in direct proportion to chip counts. An ICM chop uses the Independent Chip Model, which pays short stacks more and big stacks less because chips have diminishing value. ICM is the fairer method.
Why does the chip leader get less in an ICM chop?
Because the big stack's chips are worth less per chip — first place doesn't pay double second. ICM caps the leader near the top prize and lifts short stacks above their raw chip share, reflecting true win probability and the prize ladder.
Should I take an ICM deal?
Take it when the numbers are fair and you value reducing variance, especially if you're the short or medium stack. Decline if you have a real skill edge, the deal undervalues your position, or there's a trophy or future equity at stake.